POCT vs. BUFF
POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, POCT returned 9.90%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for BUFF. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
POCT vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with POCT having a 5.54% return and BUFF slightly higher at 5.70%.
POCT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.54% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 12.80% | -7.12% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.70% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 32.32% | -5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and BUFF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between POCT and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
POCT vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
POCT
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
POCT
BUFF
Financial Services
POCT
BUFF
Communication Services
POCT
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
POCT
BUFF
Healthcare
POCT
BUFF
Industrials
POCT
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
POCT
BUFF
Energy
POCT
BUFF
Utilities
POCT
BUFF
Real Estate
POCT
BUFF
Basic Materials
POCT
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
BUFF
POCT vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.94 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.56 | 4.44 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.61 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 4.30 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.14 | 23.03 | -4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.94 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 1.05 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.49 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -46.23% | +27.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -3.58% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.22% | -10.24% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -10.24% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -6.19% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.67% | +0.19% |
Volatility
POCT vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 0.92% and 0.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.96% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 3.82% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16% | 5.15% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 8.41% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 17.68% | -7.45% |
POCT vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
POCT vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POCT and BUFF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFF has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to POCT (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.90% vs 8.80% for BUFF. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
POCT and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCT and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer