POAGX vs. MMGPX
POAGX (PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, POAGX returned 9.62%/yr vs -7.54%/yr for MMGPX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POAGX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POAGX achieves a 23.71% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.47% return.
POAGX
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 23.71%
- 6M
- 21.17%
- 1Y
- 54.22%
- 3Y*
- 24.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -6.19%
- 1Y
- -8.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- -7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 23.71% | 28.68% | 12.56% | 25.02% | -24.25% | 4.02% | 29.17% | 23.52% | -7.10% | 29.46% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.47% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between POAGX and MMGPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between POAGX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POAGX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
POAGX
MMGPX
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POAGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.98 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | -0.24 | +3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | -0.49 | +14.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POAGX drawdown since its inception was -55.77%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POAGX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POAGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.77% | -75.38% | +19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -27.79% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -29.27% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.80% | -72.70% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -41.72% | +38.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -30.29% | +20.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 13.66% | -9.47% |
Volatility
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) at 9.72%. This indicates that POAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POAGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.07% | 9.72% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 21.72% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 28.55% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 39.82% | -16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 35.22% | -12.18% |
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POAGX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
POAGX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
POAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.71% | 13.25% | 9.90% | 5.54% | 10.78% | 5.93% | 7.84% | 5.33% | 7.82% | 0.86% | 16.63% | 12.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POAGX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POAGX has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to MMGPX (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POAGX dropped -55.77% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
POAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POAGX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer