PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNNT vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PNNT vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a -29.84% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PNNT has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 7.07%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.02% annualized return.


PNNT

1D
1.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
-29.84%
6M
-27.65%
1Y
-33.82%
3Y*
0.38%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
7.07%

JPM

1D
2.31%
1M
6.82%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.66%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
34.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
21.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNNT vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-29.84%-2.96%16.56%37.25%-8.90%61.71%-17.99%14.30%2.05%-0.65%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.50%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PNNT and JPM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.42

The correlation between PNNT and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PNNT:

$302.41

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

PNNT:

0.01

JPM:

15.21

PEG Ratio

PNNT:

0.00

JPM:

1.68

PS Ratio

PNNT:

2.20

JPM:

3.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNNT:

$85.01M

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNNT:

$24.12M

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

PNNT:

$16.10M

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNNT vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNNT vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PNNTJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.18

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

1.42

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

3.36

-5.00

PNNT vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNNT and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PNNT vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNNTJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.16%

-76.16%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.61%

-15.47%

-27.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

-24.42%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

-38.77%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

-43.63%

-25.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.28%

-3.66%

-36.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-17.62%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.58%

6.54%

+14.04%

Volatility

PNNT vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.35%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNNTJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.97%

6.35%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.95%

16.67%

+7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

21.76%

+5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

24.46%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.76%

27.39%

+5.37%

Dividends

PNNT vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.94%, more than JPM's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.84%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
24.94%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%

Financials

PNNT vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PennantPark Investment Corporation and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
27.25M
73.66B
(PNNT) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PNNT and JPM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNNT has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to JPM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNNT dropped -82.16% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNNT and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer