PNNT vs. DIV
PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) is a stock, while DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Over the past 10 years, PNNT returned 4.88%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for DIV. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PNNT vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PNNT achieves a -35.21% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 18.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PNNT has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 4.88%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.20% annualized return.
PNNT
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -37.52%
- YTD
- -35.21%
- 1Y
- -43.33%
- 3Y*
- -4.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
DIV
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
PNNT vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -35.21% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 61.71% | -17.99% | 14.30% | 2.05% | -0.65% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 18.32% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNNT and DIV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PNNT and DIV has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNNT vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
PNNT
DIV
PNNT vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNNT | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.32 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.88 | -4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 10.55 | -12.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNNT vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNNT drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNNT and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNNT | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.16% | -52.74% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.57% | -5.23% | -42.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.57% | -12.33% | -35.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -21.14% | -26.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.14% | -52.74% | -16.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.85% | 0.00% | -44.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -6.98% | -8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.57% | 1.92% | +22.65% |
Volatility
PNNT vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.90%. This indicates that PNNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNNT | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.30% | 3.90% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.63% | 7.81% | +16.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.22% | 10.68% | +17.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 13.71% | +10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 17.99% | +14.87% |
Dividends
PNNT vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
PNNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.74%, more than DIV's 6.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.50% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 26.74% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNNT and DIV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNNT has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to DIV (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNNT dropped -82.16% vs DIV's -52.74%.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNNT and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer