PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNGAX vs. PEYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PNGAX having a 9.56% return and PEYAX slightly higher at 9.88%. Over the past 10 years, PNGAX has underperformed PEYAX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while PEYAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.


PNGAX

1D
0.80%
1M
3.00%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.44%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
9.82%

PEYAX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.96%
YTD
9.88%
6M
11.85%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
9.56%34.66%5.86%18.50%-6.85%14.24%4.19%19.96%-18.02%24.09%
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
9.88%20.09%18.99%15.09%-8.37%26.84%5.87%29.94%-8.63%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PNGAX and PEYAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996

0.69

The correlation between PNGAX and PEYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNGAX vs. PEYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNGAX
PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PEYAX
PEYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PEYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PEYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNGAXPEYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.85

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

15.02

-7.28

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the PEYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNGAX and PEYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PNGAXPEYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.66

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.82

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.77

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.38

-0.02

Drawdowns

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNGAX drawdown since its inception was -64.78%, which is greater than PEYAX's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAX and PEYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNGAXPEYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.78%

-56.92%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-7.23%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.87%

-15.12%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.37%

-15.31%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.58%

-36.06%

-5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

0.00%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-14.06%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.85%

+0.99%

Volatility

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX) at 2.58%. This indicates that PNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNGAXPEYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.58%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

8.01%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

10.47%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

14.68%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.06%

0.00%

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNGAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than PEYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PNGAX vs. PEYAX - Dividend Comparison

PNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than PEYAX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
4.81%5.36%6.80%4.93%1.21%7.09%5.97%3.79%5.67%3.31%2.27%5.86%
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
2.71%2.97%3.89%2.35%1.63%5.70%1.84%3.91%4.34%1.11%2.23%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PNGAX and PEYAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNGAX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to PEYAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNGAX dropped -64.78% vs PEYAX's -56.92%.

PEYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNGAX and PEYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer