PNGAX vs. FAOSX
PNGAX (Putnam International Value Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PNGAX returned 11.19%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PNGAX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PNGAX
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 8.00% | 34.66% | 5.86% | 18.50% | -6.85% | 14.24% | 4.19% | 19.96% | -18.02% | 20.57% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PNGAX and FAOSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PNGAX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PNGAX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
PNGAX
FAOSX
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PNGAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.09 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | -0.14 | +7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PNGAX drawdown since its inception was -64.78%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNGAX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PNGAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.78% | -36.24% | -28.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -7.26% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | -13.96% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.37% | -36.24% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -5.86% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.79% | -7.92% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 4.15% | -1.30% |
Volatility
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PNGAX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 0.00% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 3.63% | +8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 8.75% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 16.71% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.64% | +0.13% |
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PNGAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PNGAX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
PNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 2.75% | 2.97% | 3.89% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 5.70% | 1.84% | 3.91% | 4.34% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PNGAX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNGAX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNGAX dropped -64.78% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
PNGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PNGAX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer