PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMVAX vs. PEQSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future Fund (PMVAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMVAX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than PEQSX's 15.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PMVAX has underperformed PEQSX with an annualized return of 8.85%, while PEQSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.


PMVAX

1D
2.58%
1M
-4.05%
6M
4.28%
YTD
1.73%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
8.85%
ALL TIME*
9.24%

PEQSX

1D
1.28%
1M
2.67%
6M
11.34%
YTD
15.20%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
14.31%
ALL TIME*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMVAX
Putnam Sustainable Future Fund
1.73%2.64%14.87%28.60%-33.93%5.99%52.93%29.77%-7.08%10.61%
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
15.20%20.49%19.41%15.45%-2.74%27.33%6.23%29.79%-8.29%19.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PMVAX and PEQSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.80

The correlation between PMVAX and PEQSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMVAX vs. PEQSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMVAX
PMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PEQSX
PEQSX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PEQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PEQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future Fund (PMVAX) and Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMVAXPEQSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.45

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.85

-3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

15.27

-15.36

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMVAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the PEQSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMVAX and PEQSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMVAX drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, which is greater than PEQSX's maximum drawdown of -36.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMVAX and PEQSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMVAXPEQSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.94%

-36.04%

-25.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

-7.18%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-15.01%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.20%

-15.18%

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.20%

-36.04%

-8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.36%

0.00%

-9.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-3.18%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

1.81%

+3.52%

Volatility

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Future Fund (PMVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) at 3.08%. This indicates that PMVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMVAXPEQSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

3.08%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

8.44%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

11.06%

+6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

14.50%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

16.95%

+3.55%

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMVAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PEQSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMVAX vs. PEQSX - Dividend Comparison

PMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, more than PEQSX's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
4.86%5.69%7.14%5.26%7.40%7.40%6.30%3.66%6.08%3.56%2.66%6.31%
PMVAX
Putnam Sustainable Future Fund
14.00%14.24%12.53%0.00%0.00%16.32%10.06%2.67%31.09%4.49%2.25%8.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMVAX and PEQSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMVAX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to PEQSX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMVAX dropped -61.94% vs PEQSX's -36.04%.

PEQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMVAX and PEQSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer