PMVAX vs. MMGPX
PMVAX (Putnam Sustainable Future Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PMVAX returned 0.19%/yr vs -7.25%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMVAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMVAX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.33% return.
PMVAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMVAX Putnam Sustainable Future Fund | 5.57% | 2.64% | 14.87% | 28.60% | -33.93% | 5.99% | 52.93% | 29.77% | -7.08% | 7.14% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMVAX and MMGPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PMVAX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMVAX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
PMVAX
MMGPX
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future Fund (PMVAX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMVAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.99 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.20 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | -0.40 | +2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMVAX drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMVAX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMVAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.94% | -75.38% | +13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | -27.79% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -29.27% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.20% | -72.70% | +28.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | -41.64% | +35.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -30.29% | +19.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 13.62% | -8.52% |
Volatility
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Future Fund (PMVAX) is 6.01%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that PMVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMVAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 9.77% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 21.75% | -8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 28.61% | -11.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 39.83% | -18.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 35.22% | -14.71% |
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMVAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMVAX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
PMVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMVAX Putnam Sustainable Future Fund | 13.49% | 14.24% | 12.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.32% | 10.06% | 2.67% | 31.09% | 4.49% | 2.25% | 8.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMVAX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to PMVAX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMVAX dropped -61.94% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
PMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMVAX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer