PMTS vs. FSLR
PMTS (CPI Card Group Inc.) and FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) are both stocks. PMTS operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while FSLR operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PMTS returned -2.04%/yr vs 20.51%/yr for FSLR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PMTS vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMTS achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSLR's 21.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PMTS has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of -2.04%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.
PMTS
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- -28.81%
- 3Y*
- -15.96%
- 5Y*
- -3.48%
- 10Y*
- -2.04%
FSLR
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 50.55%
- YTD
- 21.83%
- 6M
- 24.29%
- 1Y
- 99.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 33.22%
- 10Y*
- 20.51%
PMTS vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMTS CPI Card Group Inc. | 10.42% | -50.89% | 55.76% | -46.81% | 94.50% | 322.55% | 387.78% | -60.70% | -37.60% | -81.78% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 21.83% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMTS and FSLR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.12 |
The correlation between PMTS and FSLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PMTS:
$192.21M
FSLR:
$34.25B
PMTS:
$1.24
FSLR:
$15.48
PMTS:
13.08
FSLR:
20.56
PMTS:
1.01
FSLR:
0.49
PMTS:
0.34
FSLR:
6.32
PMTS:
$567.88M
FSLR:
$5.42B
PMTS:
$173.52M
FSLR:
$2.26B
PMTS:
$69.95M
FSLR:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMTS vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank
PMTS
FSLR
PMTS vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMTS | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | 1.79 | -2.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | 2.31 | -2.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.86 | -3.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 6.08 | -6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMTS | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 1.79 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.62 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.41 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.23 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PMTS vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMTS drawdown since its inception was -99.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMTS and FSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMTS | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.04% | -96.22% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -35.10% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.08% | -59.97% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.92% | -59.97% | -14.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.09% | -61.26% | -36.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.11% | 0.00% | -73.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.72% | -63.28% | -9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.26% | 16.45% | +20.81% |
Volatility
PMTS vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison
CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) have volatilities of 16.13% and 16.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMTS | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.13% | 16.10% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.95% | 38.80% | +12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.76% | 56.48% | +19.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.39% | 53.65% | +19.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.16% | 50.61% | +32.55% |
Dividends
PMTS vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMTS nor FSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMTS CPI Card Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.26% | 4.34% |
Financials
PMTS vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CPI Card Group Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PMTS vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison
PMTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CPI Card Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.12M and revenue of 147.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
FSLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.13M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.
PMTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CPI Card Group Inc. reported an operating income of 10.99M and revenue of 147.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
FSLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.30M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.
PMTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CPI Card Group Inc. reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 147.11M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
FSLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 346.62M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PMTS and FSLR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMTS has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to FSLR (16.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMTS dropped -99.04% vs FSLR's -96.22%.
FSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMTS and FSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer