PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMTIX vs. DRIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) and Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMTIX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than DRIHX's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PMTIX has underperformed DRIHX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while DRIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.


PMTIX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.76%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.69%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.74%

DRIHX

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.45%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMTIX
Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund
5.39%13.25%12.86%15.11%-16.81%12.70%14.71%22.40%-7.45%18.41%
DRIHX
Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
7.77%14.48%11.11%16.06%-16.20%16.54%12.73%22.12%-7.66%19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PMTIX and DRIHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between PMTIX and DRIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMTIX vs. DRIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMTIX
PMTIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PMTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PMTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIHX
DRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) and Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMTIXDRIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.85

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

12.31

-0.96

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DRIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMTIX and DRIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMTIXDRIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.33

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.61

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.75

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.75

-0.26

Drawdowns

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMTIX drawdown since its inception was -52.14%, which is greater than DRIHX's maximum drawdown of -27.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMTIX and DRIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMTIXDRIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.14%

-27.96%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-6.96%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

-11.75%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-22.51%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.87%

-27.96%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.54%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-4.07%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.61%

-0.30%

Volatility

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) is 2.47%, while Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that PMTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMTIXDRIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.70%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.16%

6.72%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.64%

8.51%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

11.60%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.22%

12.79%

-1.57%

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMTIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIHX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PMTIX vs. DRIHX - Dividend Comparison

PMTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than DRIHX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIHX
Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
4.67%5.15%3.42%3.71%4.43%2.58%3.05%2.24%2.34%1.22%1.40%0.00%
PMTIX
Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund
9.20%9.69%9.60%4.26%10.05%8.87%6.37%6.49%8.21%5.87%3.97%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PMTIX and DRIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIHX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to PMTIX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMTIX dropped -52.14% vs DRIHX's -27.96%.

DRIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMTIX and DRIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer