PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIHX vs. DRIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIHX achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than DRIKX's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIHX has underperformed DRIKX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while DRIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


DRIHX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.96%
YTD
8.06%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
9.55%

DRIKX

1D
0.27%
1M
4.23%
YTD
11.99%
6M
13.14%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIHX
Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
8.06%14.48%11.11%16.06%-16.20%16.54%12.73%22.12%-7.66%19.53%
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.99%19.29%17.19%21.26%-15.32%21.28%14.20%25.63%-9.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIHX and DRIKX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between DRIHX and DRIKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (1 year) to 0.97 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIHX vs. DRIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIHX
DRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIKX
DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIHXDRIKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.83

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.96

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.20

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.11

19.10

-5.99

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the DRIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIHX and DRIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIHXDRIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.83

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.79

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.81

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.81

-0.05

Drawdowns

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIHX drawdown since its inception was -27.96%, smaller than the maximum DRIKX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIHX and DRIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIHXDRIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.96%

-33.48%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-8.59%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.75%

-16.02%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-23.49%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.96%

-33.48%

+5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.25%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.89%

-0.28%

Volatility

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIHX) is 2.69%, while Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that DRIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIHXDRIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.11%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.72%

8.71%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

11.22%

-2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.60%

14.83%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.79%

15.75%

-2.96%

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRIHX and DRIKX have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIHX vs. DRIKX - Dividend Comparison

DRIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than DRIKX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIHX
Dimensional 2040 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
4.66%5.15%3.42%3.71%4.43%2.58%3.05%2.24%2.34%1.22%1.40%
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.32%1.24%2.44%3.19%3.92%2.37%2.41%2.12%2.27%1.18%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIHX and DRIKX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIKX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to DRIHX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIHX dropped -27.96% vs DRIKX's -33.48%.

DRIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIHX and DRIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer