PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMMY vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMMY vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMMY achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX's 3.09% return.


PMMY

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.74%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMMY vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMMY and SMAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.71

The correlation between PMMY and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMMY vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMMY vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMMYSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.45

1.75

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.90

4.81

+12.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

89.69

26.11

+63.58

PMMY vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMMY Sharpe Ratio is 5.35, which is higher than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMMY and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMMYSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35

3.46

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.56

2.01

+2.55

Drawdowns

PMMY vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMMY drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum SMAX drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMY and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMYSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-3.90%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.36%

-1.91%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.09%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.40%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.35%

-0.28%

Volatility

PMMY vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) is 0.36%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that PMMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMYSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.38%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

2.10%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12%

2.67%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.39%

3.67%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.39%

3.67%

-2.28%

PMMY vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMMY and SMAX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PMMY vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

PMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024
PMMY
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.95%0.98%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMMY and SMAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMAX has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMY dropped -0.36% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, SMAX leads with 9.17% vs 5.98% for PMMY. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMAX has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY and SMAX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for PMMY.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMMY and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer