PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMMF vs. IBIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMMF vs. IBIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PMMF having a 1.53% return and IBIH slightly higher at 1.60%.


PMMF

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIH

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.34%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMMF vs. IBIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMMF and IBIH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMMF vs. IBIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMMF
PMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIH
IBIH Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIH Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMMF vs. IBIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMMFIBIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+18.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+92.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

38.37

1.29

+37.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

161.17

2.98

+158.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,488.23

10.16

+1,478.07

PMMF vs. IBIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMMF Sharpe Ratio is 19.72, which is higher than the IBIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMMF and IBIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMMFIBIHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72

1.62

+18.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

11.98

1.24

+10.73

Drawdowns

PMMF vs. IBIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum IBIH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMF and IBIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMFIBIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-3.94%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-1.70%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.62%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.96%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.51%

-0.51%

Volatility

PMMF vs. IBIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) is 0.05%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that PMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMFIBIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.83%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

2.09%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

3.15%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.34%

4.93%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.34%

4.93%

-4.59%

PMMF vs. IBIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIH's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PMMF vs. IBIH - Dividend Comparison

PMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than IBIH's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIH
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF
3.90%4.68%4.34%0.70%
PMMF
iShares Prime Money Market ETF
3.83%3.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMMF and IBIH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIH has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to PMMF (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMF dropped -0.13% vs IBIH's -3.94%.

On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.04% vs 4.00% for PMMF. On fees, IBIH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PMMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.04% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PMMF.

IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.83% for PMMF.

PMMF is categorized as Money Market, while IBIH is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PMMF and 0.10% for IBIH.

PMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.72 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMMF and IBIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer