PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PMM.TO is traded in CAD, while BTCC-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCC-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMM.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than BTCC-U.TO's -24.75% return.


PMM.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.07%
YTD
5.69%
6M
3.53%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
3.51%

BTCC-U.TO

1D
-1.51%
1M
-16.75%
YTD
-24.75%
6M
-30.72%
1Y
-38.53%
3Y*
33.54%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PMM.TO
Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund
5.69%6.07%20.49%5.85%-3.80%4.54%
BTCC-U.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units
-24.75%-11.70%137.29%147.56%-62.34%-14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PMM.TO and BTCC-U.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2021

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMM.TO
PMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCC-U.TO
BTCC-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMM.TOBTCC-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.86

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

-0.77

+5.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

-1.32

+15.18

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMM.TO and BTCC-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMM.TOBTCC-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

-0.90

+2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.26

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.08

+0.22

Drawdowns

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, smaller than the maximum BTCC-U.TO drawdown of -75.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMM.TO and BTCC-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMM.TOBTCC-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-75.02%

+51.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.50%

-50.22%

+46.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.87%

-50.22%

+40.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.18%

-75.02%

+63.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-48.58%

+48.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-32.78%

+24.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

29.12%

-27.86%

Volatility

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) is 2.01%, while Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that PMM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCC-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMM.TOBTCC-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

10.03%

-8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

34.40%

-28.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

43.04%

-33.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

53.56%

-43.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

54.69%

-44.56%

Dividends

PMM.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMM.TO nor BTCC-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTCC-U.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PMM.TO
Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.92%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMM.TO and BTCC-U.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMM.TO is categorized as Long-Short, while BTCC-U.TO is Cryptocurrency.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMM.TO and BTCC-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer