PML vs. PTY
PML (PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II) and PTY (PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - PML is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while PTY is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PML returned -0.28%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for PTY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PML charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for PTY.
Performance
PML vs. PTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PML achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than PTY's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PML has underperformed PTY with an annualized return of -0.28%, while PTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.
PML
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- -0.40%
- 5Y*
- -7.88%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
PTY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- -3.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
PML vs. PTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PML PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II | 3.43% | -0.89% | 2.93% | -3.06% | -34.06% | 7.16% | -5.17% | 25.60% | 7.25% | 14.48% |
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund | -1.00% | -0.51% | 19.87% | 22.56% | -18.71% | 0.40% | 3.24% | 35.36% | 2.49% | 26.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PML and PTY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2002 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PML vs. PTY — Risk / Return Rank
PML
PTY
PML vs. PTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PML | PTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.23 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | -0.42 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PML vs. PTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PML drawdown since its inception was -64.34%, which is greater than PTY's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PML and PTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PML | PTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.34% | -60.86% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -15.44% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.35% | -16.04% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | -41.38% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.94% | -46.55% | -1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.12% | -10.15% | -23.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -8.62% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 8.46% | -5.63% |
Volatility
PML vs. PTY - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (PTY) at 2.42%. This indicates that PML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PML | PTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.42% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 7.51% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 11.02% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 17.25% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 21.18% | -5.70% |
PML vs. PTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PML has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PTY's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PML vs. PTY - Dividend Comparison
PML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than PTY's 11.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PML PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II | 6.31% | 6.29% | 5.86% | 5.71% | 7.83% | 4.85% | 4.95% | 4.91% | 5.86% | 5.92% | 6.38% | 6.24% |
PTY PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund | 11.94% | 11.05% | 9.92% | 10.77% | 13.12% | 9.16% | 8.74% | 8.37% | 10.63% | 9.48% | 12.09% | 11.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PML and PTY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PML has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to PTY (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PML dropped -64.34% vs PTY's -60.86%.
PML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PML and PTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer