PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMIO vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMIO vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF (PMIO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PMIO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMIO vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMIO vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMIO
PMIO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PMIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PMIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMIO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMIO vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF (PMIO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMIOIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

PMIO vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMIOIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

Drawdowns

PMIO vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMIO drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMIO and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMIOIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

0.00%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

Volatility

PMIO vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMIOIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

0.00%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

0.00%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.08%

0.00%

+3.08%

PMIO vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMIO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PMIO vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

PMIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IBMM
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PMIO
PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF
3.92%4.00%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PMIO.

PMIO has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PMIO and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMIO and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer