PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PMIF-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZLB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZLB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMIF-U.TO achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than ZLB.TO's 2.71% return.


PMIF-U.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.49%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*

ZLB.TO

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
2.71%
6M
5.33%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PMIF-U.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
0.45%9.02%3.83%7.22%-6.89%0.89%3.42%7.02%0.69%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
2.71%31.29%6.20%11.90%-7.02%23.84%3.54%28.01%-6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018

0.15

The correlation between PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMIF-U.TO
PMIF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMIF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMIF-U.TOZLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.31

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

8.86

-0.48

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMIF-U.TOZLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.52

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Drawdowns

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMIF-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMIF-U.TOZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-39.76%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-6.29%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-12.66%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.03%

-21.22%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-2.17%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-4.22%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.64%

-0.81%

Volatility

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) is 1.26%, while BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that PMIF-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMIF-U.TOZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

2.77%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

7.25%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

9.55%

-6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.05%

13.03%

-7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.71%

15.41%

-8.70%

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMIF-U.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMIF-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PMIF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMIF-U.TO
PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)
3.94%3.96%4.91%4.53%2.82%2.40%2.68%2.38%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
1.87%1.93%2.37%2.67%2.66%2.39%2.83%2.44%2.76%2.52%2.94%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZLB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for PMIF-U.TO.

PMIF-U.TO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for PMIF-U.TO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMIF-U.TO and ZLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer