PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMDE vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMDE vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 12.76% return.


PMDE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.33%
1M
2.10%
YTD
12.76%
6M
12.47%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMDE vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMDE and KAPR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMDE vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMDE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMDE vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMDEKAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.44

PMDE vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMDE vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and KAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMDEKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-16.91%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-3.89%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

Volatility

PMDE vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMDEKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

6.70%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.47%

11.76%

-9.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.47%

11.65%

-9.18%

PMDE vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMDE vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMDE nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMDE and KAPR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

PMDE and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PMDE tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while KAPR tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.79% for KAPR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMDE and KAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer