PMDE vs. JANH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PMDE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December) and JANH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - PMDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while JANH is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. PMDE is passively managed, while JANH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMDE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JANH.

Performance

PMDE vs. JANH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than JANH's 3.32% return.

PMDE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 3.28%
• 1Y: 6.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMDE vs. JANH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December	2.41%	0.44%
JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January	3.32%	0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PMDE and JANH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

PMDE vs. JANH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMDE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JANH

JANH Risk / Return Rank: 75
JANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JANH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
JANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JANH Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMDE vs. JANH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMDE	JANH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.25	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.74	—

Drawdowns

PMDE vs. JANH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum JANH drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and JANH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMDE	JANH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-8.00%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.28%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-0.30%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMDE	JANH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46%	3.50%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.46%	6.33%	-3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.46%	6.33%	-3.87%

PMDE vs. JANH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JANH's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMDE vs. JANH - Dividend Comparison

PMDE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JANH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January	6.13%	6.20%	6.71%
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMDE and JANH in my portfolio?

PMDE and JANH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMDE or JANH?

On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMDE or JANH?

PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMDE or JANH?

JANH has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 0.00% for PMDE.

What is the main difference between PMDE and JANH?

PMDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JANH is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.79% for JANH.