PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMDE vs. APRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMDE vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 10.09% return.


PMDE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRT

1D
0.18%
1M
1.95%
YTD
10.09%
6M
11.06%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMDE vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMDE and APRT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMDE vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMDE

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMDE vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMDE vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMDEAPRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.58

1.11

+1.47

Drawdowns

PMDE vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum APRT drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and APRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMDEAPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-14.98%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-2.05%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

Volatility

PMDE vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMDEAPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

5.01%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.46%

10.78%

-8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

10.29%

-7.83%

PMDE vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMDE vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMDE nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
PMDE
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMDE and APRT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for APRT.

PMDE and APRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PMDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while APRT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.74% for APRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMDE and APRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer