PMBMX vs. PMTIX
PMBMX (Principal MidCap Fund) and PMTIX (Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund) are both mutual funds - PMBMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while PMTIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX returned 11.55%/yr vs 8.55%/yr for PMTIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMBMX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PMTIX.
Performance
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBMX achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than PMTIX's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX has outperformed PMTIX with an annualized return of 11.55%, while PMTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.
PMBMX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
PMTIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | -3.42% | 1.16% | 23.38% | 25.36% | -23.52% | 24.63% | 17.69% | 49.09% | -7.28% | 24.73% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 5.32% | 13.25% | 12.86% | 15.11% | -16.81% | 12.70% | 14.71% | 22.40% | -7.45% | 18.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBMX and PMTIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2001 | 0.92 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMBMX and PMTIX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBMX vs. PMTIX — Risk / Return Rank
PMBMX
PMTIX
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMBMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.06 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 8.85 | -9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBMX drawdown since its inception was -50.69%, roughly equal to the maximum PMTIX drawdown of -52.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBMX and PMTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.69% | -52.14% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.53% | -5.85% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -9.62% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.48% | -23.05% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -25.87% | -14.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.90% | -0.66% | -9.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -6.76% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.80% | 1.36% | +8.44% |
Volatility
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Volatility Comparison
Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) at 2.28%. This indicates that PMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBMX | PMTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 2.28% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 6.86% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.77% | 8.16% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 10.63% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 11.15% | +7.98% |
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PMTIX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBMX vs. PMTIX - Dividend Comparison
PMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than PMTIX's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | 6.64% | 6.41% | 6.86% | 2.68% | 3.43% | 8.51% | 1.15% | 9.00% | 12.79% | 3.39% | 2.16% | 6.38% |
PMTIX Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund | 9.20% | 9.69% | 9.60% | 4.26% | 10.05% | 8.87% | 6.37% | 6.49% | 8.21% | 5.87% | 3.97% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBMX and PMTIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMBMX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to PMTIX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBMX dropped -50.69% vs PMTIX's -52.14%.
PMTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMBMX and PMTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer