PMBMX vs. GEMIX
PMBMX (Principal MidCap Fund) and GEMIX (Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - PMBMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while GEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX returned 11.86%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for GEMIX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMBMX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for GEMIX.
Performance
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBMX achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than GEMIX's 27.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX has outperformed GEMIX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while GEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.
PMBMX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- -8.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
GEMIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 27.89%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- 1Y
- 50.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | -6.62% | 1.16% | 23.38% | 25.36% | -23.52% | 24.63% | 17.69% | 49.09% | -7.28% | 24.73% |
GEMIX Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 27.89% | 32.84% | 9.10% | 6.63% | -30.01% | -2.48% | 30.98% | 26.06% | -20.60% | 48.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBMX and GEMIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2000 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMBMX and GEMIX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBMX vs. GEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
PMBMX
GEMIX
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMBMX | GEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.77 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 13.89 | -14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBMX drawdown since its inception was -50.69%, smaller than the maximum GEMIX drawdown of -68.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBMX and GEMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBMX | GEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.69% | -68.46% | +17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.53% | -13.65% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -18.46% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.48% | -44.71% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -47.24% | +6.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.87% | -5.18% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -19.67% | +12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 3.68% | +5.74% |
Volatility
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) is 4.46%, while Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMIX) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that PMBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBMX | GEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 13.16% | -8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 20.67% | -8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 22.76% | -8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 18.43% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 18.42% | +0.74% |
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GEMIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBMX vs. GEMIX - Dividend Comparison
PMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than GEMIX's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEMIX Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.61% | 0.78% | 1.09% | 1.33% | 0.22% | 0.95% | 0.31% | 1.09% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 1.09% | 0.10% |
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund | 6.86% | 6.41% | 6.86% | 2.68% | 3.43% | 8.51% | 1.15% | 9.00% | 12.79% | 3.39% | 2.16% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBMX and GEMIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEMIX has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to PMBMX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBMX dropped -50.69% vs GEMIX's -68.46%.
GEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMBMX and GEMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer