PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBIX vs. PCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBIX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Total Return II Fund (PMBIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBIX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PMBIX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 2.14%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.14% annualized return.


PMBIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
2.14%

PCN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
1.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBIX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMBIX
PIMCO Total Return II Fund
0.18%8.18%2.46%6.45%-14.65%-1.46%8.33%9.62%0.30%4.66%
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-4.37%5.55%19.52%16.22%-22.88%6.93%-2.19%39.10%-5.94%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PMBIX and PCN is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2001

0.09

Over the past year, PMBIX and PCN have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBIX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBIX
PMBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PMBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBIX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return II Fund (PMBIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMBIXPCNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.14

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

0.27

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.13

+1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

0.39

+5.67

PMBIX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBIX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMBIXPCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.14

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.04

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.33

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.39

+0.67

Drawdowns

PMBIX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBIX and PCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBIXPCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-61.12%

+41.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-10.40%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-22.53%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.51%

-33.39%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

-50.27%

+30.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-6.87%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-7.20%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

3.56%

-2.49%

Volatility

PMBIX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Total Return II Fund (PMBIX) is 1.74%, while PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that PMBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBIXPCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

2.35%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

6.97%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

9.61%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

16.18%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

21.94%

-16.85%

PMBIX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBIX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PMBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than PCN's 11.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.58%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%
PMBIX
PIMCO Total Return II Fund
3.91%3.84%3.79%3.46%1.85%1.51%7.15%5.23%3.13%2.57%3.72%6.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMBIX and PCN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCN has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to PMBIX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBIX dropped -19.54% vs PCN's -61.12%.

PMBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBIX and PCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer