PMAY vs. PSFM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM).

PMAY and PSFM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PMAY is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It was launched on Apr 30, 2020. PSFM is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021.

Performance

PMAY vs. PSFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PMAY vs. PSFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May	0.88%	10.26%	14.08%	12.05%	-8.08%	5.93%
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF	1.90%	7.28%	14.18%	18.32%	-5.23%	11.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than PSFM's 1.90% return.

PMAY

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 11.56%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: —

PSFM

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 4.01%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAY vs. PSFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSFM's 0.61% expense ratio.

PMAY

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May

PSFM

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF

Return for Risk

PMAY vs. PSFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAY

PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 71
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PSFM

PSFM Risk / Return Rank: 77
PSFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PSFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PSFM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PSFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PSFM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAY vs. PSFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMAY	PSFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.21	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.90	-0.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.62	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	10.90	-1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMAY vs. PSFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the PSFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAY and PSFM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMAY	PSFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.21	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.88	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between PMAY and PSFM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PMAY vs. PSFM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAY nor PSFM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PMAY vs. PSFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum PSFM drawdown of -14.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and PSFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAY	PSFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.05%	-14.33%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-8.58%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-2.34%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	1.28%	+0.01%

Volatility

PMAY vs. PSFM - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) at 1.70%. This indicates that PMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMAY	PSFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	1.70%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	2.53%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	11.00%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.69%	10.65%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.50%	10.65%	-2.15%