PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAY vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PMAY vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PMAY vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
0.88%10.26%5.52%
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
-0.75%10.44%5.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's -0.75% return.


PMAY

1D
1.47%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.88%
6M
2.69%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*

PBFR

1D
1.19%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.42%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PMAY vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PMAY vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAY
PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAY vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMAYPBFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.34

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.99

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.84

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.19

10.86

-1.66

PMAY vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAY and PBFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMAYPBFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.34

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

1.20

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between PMAY and PBFR is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PMAY vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Drawdowns

PMAY vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and PBFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAYPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-8.50%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-6.15%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.56%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-0.68%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.04%

+0.25%

Volatility

PMAY vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is 2.20%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that PMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PMAYPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

2.42%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

3.46%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

8.18%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.69%

7.13%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.50%

7.13%

+1.37%