PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAU vs. PBAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMAU vs. PBAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - August (PBAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAU achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than PBAU's 4.33% return.


PMAU

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.95%
6M
3.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBAU

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.38%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.01%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAU vs. PBAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMAU and PBAU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMAU vs. PBAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAU

PBAU
PBAU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PBAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBAU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PBAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAU vs. PBAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - August (PBAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMAU vs. PBAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMAUPBAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.90

1.58

+1.31

Drawdowns

PMAU vs. PBAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAU drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum PBAU drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAU and PBAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAUPBAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-8.87%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.05%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.66%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

Volatility

PMAU vs. PBAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMAUPBAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

4.91%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

7.21%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

7.21%

-4.70%

PMAU vs. PBAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMAU and PBAU have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PMAU vs. PBAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAU nor PBAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PMAU and PBAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMAU and PBAU have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

PMAU and PBAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMAU and PBAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer