PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAU vs. PAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMAU vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAU achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly higher than PAAA's 2.03% return.


PMAU

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.95%
6M
3.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAAA

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.45%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAU vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PMAU
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August
2.95%2.98%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
2.03%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAU and PAAA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMAU vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAU

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAU vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMAU vs. PAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMAUPAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.90

6.78

-3.89

Drawdowns

PMAU vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAU drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAU and PAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAUPAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-1.04%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.01%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.02%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

Volatility

PMAU vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMAUPAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

0.49%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

0.98%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

0.98%

+1.53%

PMAU vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMAU vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

PMAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.


PositionTTM202520242023
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
4.88%5.12%5.88%2.76%
PMAU
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMAU and PAAA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMAU.

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for PMAU.

PMAU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PAAA is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMAU and 0.19% for PAAA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMAU and PAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer