PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLWIX vs. FHAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLWIX achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly lower than FHAPX's 13.68% return.


PLWIX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.26%
YTD
4.62%
6M
4.75%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
7.37%

FHAPX

1D
0.66%
1M
5.28%
YTD
13.68%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PLWIX
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund
4.62%11.32%12.21%12.23%-14.36%9.05%12.70%18.40%-8.05%
FHAPX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
13.68%22.63%16.27%20.48%-19.04%16.29%17.82%26.35%-15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PLWIX and FHAPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.94

The correlation between PLWIX and FHAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLWIX vs. FHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLWIX
PLWIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PLWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PLWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FHAPX
FHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLWIXFHAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.24

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

14.35

-2.36

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLWIX and FHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLWIXFHAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.48

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.69

-0.15

Drawdowns

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLWIX drawdown since its inception was -49.07%, which is greater than FHAPX's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLWIX and FHAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLWIXFHAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.07%

-31.30%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-9.62%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.97%

-15.51%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.73%

-27.81%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-6.12%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.17%

-1.11%

Volatility

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund (PLWIX) is 1.92%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FHAPX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that PLWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLWIXFHAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

4.14%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

10.28%

-5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89%

12.56%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

15.08%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

16.92%

-8.35%

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLWIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FHAPX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLWIX vs. FHAPX - Dividend Comparison

PLWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than FHAPX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHAPX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
3.28%2.47%4.84%1.86%6.21%8.52%4.82%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLWIX
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund
9.63%10.08%11.91%5.12%9.82%9.40%5.90%8.69%7.35%5.74%3.73%8.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PLWIX and FHAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHAPX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to PLWIX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLWIX dropped -49.07% vs FHAPX's -31.30%.

FHAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLWIX and FHAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer