PLW vs. THTA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLW is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index, while THTA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by SoFi. PLW is passively managed, while THTA is actively managed. Over the past year, PLW returned 4.34% vs 16.78% for THTA. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for THTA.

Performance

PLW vs. THTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 6.86% return.

PLW

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: -0.55%
• 6M: -1.32%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: 0.89%
• 5Y*: -2.77%
• 10Y*: -0.10%

THTA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 6.86%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLW vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	-0.55%	5.84%	-2.95%	7.82%
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	6.86%	-10.24%	7.31%	1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PLW and THTA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.04

Return for Risk

PLW vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLW

PLW Risk / Return Rank: 19
PLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PLW Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PLW Martin Ratio Rank: 20

THTA

THTA Risk / Return Rank: 92
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 95
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLW vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLW	THTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	2.91	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	4.29	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.75	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	6.39	-5.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	52.08	-49.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLW vs. THTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the THTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLW and THTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLW	THTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	2.91	-2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.08	+0.24

Drawdowns

PLW vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, roughly equal to the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and THTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLW	THTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.70%	-31.41%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-2.64%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.38%	-6.79%	-15.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	-7.52%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	0.32%	+1.62%

Volatility

PLW vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) at 0.75%. This indicates that PLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLW	THTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	0.75%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.53%	4.00%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.58%	5.80%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.86%	20.25%	-10.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.10%	20.25%	-11.15%

PLW vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLW vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison

PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than THTA's 11.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	3.83%	3.75%	3.56%	2.87%	1.97%	1.15%	1.00%	1.96%	2.14%	2.02%	2.00%	2.14%
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	11.26%	12.66%	12.44%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLW and THTA in my portfolio?

PLW and THTA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLW or THTA?

PLW has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to THTA (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLW dropped -32.70% vs THTA's -31.41%.

Which ETF is better, PLW or THTA?

On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.78% vs 4.34% for PLW. On fees, PLW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLW or THTA?

Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLW or THTA?

PLW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for THTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLW or THTA?

THTA has the higher dividend yield at 11.26%, compared with 3.83% for PLW.

What is the main difference between PLW and THTA?

PLW is categorized as Government Bonds, while THTA is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.49% for THTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.