PLW vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PLW (Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLW is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. PLW is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, PLW returned 3.61% vs 56.15% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. PLW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

PLW vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 14.96% return.

PLW

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.06%
• 1Y: 3.61%
• 3Y*: 0.88%
• 5Y*: -2.91%
• 10Y*: -0.20%

BESF

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: 14.96%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 56.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLW vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	-0.10%	4.91%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	14.96%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PLW and BESF is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.24

Return for Risk

PLW vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLW

PLW Risk / Return Rank: 16
PLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PLW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
PLW Martin Ratio Rank: 17

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 75
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLW vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLW	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.28	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	3.08	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.37	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	5.14	-4.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	14.33	-12.58

PLW vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLW and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLW vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLW	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.70%	-10.97%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-10.97%	+5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.04%	-9.64%	-12.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-2.72%	-6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	3.93%	-1.87%

Volatility

PLW vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) is 1.62%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that PLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLW	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	6.87%	-5.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.67%	14.94%	-10.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.43%	24.78%	-18.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.85%	24.42%	-14.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.10%	24.42%	-15.32%

PLW vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLW vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than BESF's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.92%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF	4.16%	3.75%	3.56%	2.87%	1.97%	1.15%	1.00%	1.96%	2.14%	2.02%	2.00%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLW and BESF in my portfolio?

PLW and BESF have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLW or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to PLW (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLW dropped -32.70% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, PLW or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 56.15% vs 3.61% for PLW. On fees, PLW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PLW has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLW or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 56.15% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLW or BESF?

PLW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLW or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.16% for PLW.

What is the main difference between PLW and BESF?

PLW is categorized as Government Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.