PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLU vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLU vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLU

1D
-52.17%
1M
-46.80%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-13.98%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
65.60%
6M
74.89%
1Y
233.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLU vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLU and TSMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLU vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLU

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLU vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF (PLU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLU vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLUTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.43

-1.32

Drawdowns

PLU vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLU drawdown since its inception was -66.28%, roughly equal to the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLU and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.28%

-63.67%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.28%

-14.78%

-51.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-16.93%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.83%

Volatility

PLU vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.26%

73.11%

+142.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

215.26%

81.80%

+133.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

215.26%

81.80%

+133.46%

PLU vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLU has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLU vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

PLU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLU and TSMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for PLU.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 0.00% for PLU.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for PLU and 0.75% for TSMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLU and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer