PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTY vs. FMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTY vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -13.54% return, which is significantly lower than FMUB's 1.89% return.


PLTY

1D
-5.53%
1M
0.30%
YTD
-13.54%
6M
-14.25%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMUB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.13%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTY vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLTY and FMUB is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTY vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTY vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTYFMUBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.11

2.90

-2.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.44

4.26

-3.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.63

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.10

-2.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.26

12.33

-12.06

PLTY vs. FMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the FMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTY and FMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTYFMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

2.90

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

2.30

-1.04

Drawdowns

PLTY vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and FMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTYFMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.61%

-2.49%

-34.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-2.49%

-31.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.02%

-0.10%

-24.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-0.38%

-12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.72%

0.63%

+17.09%

Volatility

PLTY vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a higher volatility of 15.13% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) at 0.87%. This indicates that PLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTYFMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

0.87%

+14.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

1.99%

+30.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.50%

2.67%

+40.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.94%

3.25%

+49.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.94%

3.25%

+49.69%

PLTY vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTY vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison

PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.80%, more than FMUB's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
3.42%2.63%0.00%
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
108.80%112.44%7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTY and FMUB have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTY has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to FMUB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -36.61% vs FMUB's -2.49%.

On 1-year performance, FMUB leads with 7.69% vs 4.68% for PLTY. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUB has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTY.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 108.80%, compared with 3.42% for FMUB.

PLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTY and 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTY and FMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer