PLTY vs. CONY
PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTY returned 11.69% vs -36.44% for CONY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
PLTY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -20.81% return.
PLTY
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.48% | 78.06% | 49.98% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 35.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTY and CONY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between PLTY and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
PLTY
CONY
PLTY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | -0.63 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | -0.69 | +1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.92 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.57 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -0.96 | +1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | -0.63 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.17 | +1.21 |
Drawdowns
PLTY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -63.57% | +26.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -63.39% | +28.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.62% | -55.14% | +34.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -22.12% | +9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.65% | 37.50% | -19.85% |
Volatility
PLTY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) is 13.92%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that PLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.92% | 15.91% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.89% | 43.50% | -11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.13% | 58.03% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.81% | 60.00% | -7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.81% | 60.00% | -7.19% |
PLTY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PLTY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
PLTY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.78%, less than CONY's 178.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 102.78% | 112.44% | 7.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTY and CONY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to PLTY (13.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -36.61% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, PLTY leads with 11.69% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTY has been the lower-risk option at 13.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTY has performed better with a 11.69% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 102.78% for PLTY.
PLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer