PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTY vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -23.00% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.


PLTY

1D
1.10%
1M
-2.83%
6M
-8.14%
YTD
-23.00%
1Y
-16.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.31%

CHPY

1D
0.27%
1M
-11.10%
6M
39.35%
YTD
55.50%
1Y
93.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
95.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.10M$56.24M$62.00M
$4.74M$3.96M$6.06M

PLTY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLTY and CHPY is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTYCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.39

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

3.33

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

15.63

-16.46

PLTY vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTY and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTYCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.36%

-27.64%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.36%

-27.64%

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.22%

-20.81%

-12.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.41%

-3.03%

-11.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.78%

5.88%

+15.90%

Volatility

PLTY vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) is 11.37%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that PLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTYCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

17.69%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.16%

34.00%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.02%

38.28%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.23%

39.15%

+13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.23%

39.15%

+13.08%

PLTY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTY and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

PLTY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.19%, more than CHPY's 38.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
38.69%28.19%0.00%
PLTY
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
123.19%112.44%7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to PLTY (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -41.36% vs CHPY's -27.64%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 93.51% vs -16.47% for PLTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTY has been the lower-risk option at 11.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 93.51% return vs -16.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTY and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 123.19%, compared with 38.69% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTY and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer