PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -26.21% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.39% return.


PLTW

1D
-7.81%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-26.21%
6M
-26.03%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-23.39%
6M
-26.70%
1Y
-35.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-26.21%59.45%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-23.39%-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and YBTC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTWYBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.85

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

-0.76

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-1.39

+1.36

PLTW vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTWYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

-0.91

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.16

+0.02

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, roughly equal to the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and YBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-47.09%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.29%

-47.09%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.64%

-44.06%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.57%

-12.89%

-6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.21%

25.69%

-0.48%

Volatility

PLTW vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 8.85%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

8.85%

+13.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.26%

31.81%

+14.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.73%

39.20%

+22.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.85%

40.81%

+32.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.85%

40.81%

+32.04%

PLTW vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTW vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.30%, more than YBTC's 88.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
121.30%72.40%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.13%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and YBTC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -46.29% vs YBTC's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -0.85% vs -35.71% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -0.85% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 88.13% for YBTC.

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.95% for YBTC.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and YBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer