PLTW vs. PLTE.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO).

PLTW and PLTE.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. PLTE.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 16, 2025.

Performance

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-22.36%	59.45%
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	-23.81%	62.84%

Different Trading Currencies

PLTW is traded in USD, while PLTE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the PLTE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -22.36% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -23.81% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 7.69%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: -22.36%
• 6M: -26.84%
• 1Y: 75.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTE.TO

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: -23.81%
• 6M: -22.17%
• 1Y: 72.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

PLTW

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF

PLTE.TO

Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 61
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PLTE.TO

PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTW	PLTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.14	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.75	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.79	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	4.44	-0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and PLTE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTW	PLTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.14	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.18	-0.89

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and PLTE.TO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.73%, more than PLTE.TO's 35.10% yield.

	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	114.73%	72.40%
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF	35.10%	23.70%

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -44.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and PLTE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	PLTE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.33%	-43.92%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.33%	-41.32%	-4.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.49%	-33.33%	-3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.36%	-14.81%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	16.62%	+2.44%

Volatility

PLTW vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 18.41% compared to Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) at 14.48%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	PLTE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.41%	14.48%	+3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.17%	41.51%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.45%	63.45%	+6.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.38%	71.49%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.38%	71.49%	+1.89%