PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -26.21% return, which is significantly lower than MSTY's -14.73% return.


PLTW

1D
-7.81%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-26.21%
6M
-26.03%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-6.76%
1M
-28.46%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-26.86%
1Y
-61.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-26.21%59.45%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-14.73%-47.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and MSTY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTWMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.81

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

-0.86

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-1.31

+1.27

PLTW vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTWMSTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

-1.02

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.07

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-71.79%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.29%

-71.79%

+25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.64%

-66.48%

+26.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.57%

-26.09%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.21%

46.87%

-21.66%

Volatility

PLTW vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) at 17.01%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

17.01%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.26%

48.79%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.73%

60.44%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.85%

71.92%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.85%

71.92%

+0.93%

PLTW vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTW and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

PLTW vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.30%, less than MSTY's 269.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
269.45%294.61%104.56%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
121.30%72.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and MSTY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (22.32%) compared to MSTY (17.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -46.29% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -0.85% vs -61.25% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSTY has been the lower-risk option at 17.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -0.85% return vs -61.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTW and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 269.45%, compared with 121.30% for PLTW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer