PLTW vs. HYTI
PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -19.94% vs 5.91% for HYTI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
PLTW vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -32.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYTI's 2.14% return.
PLTW
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- 6M
- -31.99%
- YTD
- -32.11%
- 1Y
- -19.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -32.11% | 28.26% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 2.14% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTW and HYTI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
HYTI
PLTW vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.29 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 2.49 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 10.63 | -11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and HYTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -4.47% | -52.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.27% | -2.38% | -54.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.47% | -0.16% | -44.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -0.45% | -23.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.58% | 0.56% | +29.02% |
Volatility
PLTW vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 20.13% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.07%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.13% | 1.07% | +19.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.04% | 3.21% | +44.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.97% | 3.85% | +58.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.02% | 5.12% | +68.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.02% | 5.12% | +68.90% |
PLTW vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTW vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.02%, more than HYTI's 10.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.43% | 8.10% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 127.02% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTW and HYTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (20.13%) compared to HYTI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs HYTI's -4.47%.
On 1-year performance, HYTI leads with 5.91% vs -19.94% for PLTW. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYTI has performed better with a 5.91% return vs -19.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 127.02%, compared with 10.43% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.65% for HYTI.
HYTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTW and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer