PLTW vs. GLDY
PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -14.50% vs 6.42% for GLDY. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
PLTW vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -35.27% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -7.57% return.
PLTW
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -35.27%
- 6M
- -38.21%
- 1Y
- -14.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- 10.92%
- 1M
- -9.36%
- YTD
- -7.57%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -35.27% | 126.02% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -7.57% | 15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTW and GLDY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
GLDY
PLTW vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.08 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 0.25 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 1.01 | -1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.72% | -25.90% | -25.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.05% | -25.90% | -21.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.05% | -17.80% | -29.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -4.22% | -18.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.24% | 6.37% | +19.87% |
Volatility
PLTW vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 14.74%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 14.74% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.24% | 23.06% | +23.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.77% | 24.44% | +36.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.31% | 23.33% | +50.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.31% | 23.33% | +50.98% |
PLTW vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PLTW and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
PLTW vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 139.00%, more than GLDY's 50.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 50.86% | 37.38% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 139.00% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTW and GLDY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to GLDY (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -51.72% vs GLDY's -25.90%.
On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 6.42% vs -14.50% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 14.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 6.42% return vs -14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTW and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 139.00%, compared with 50.86% for GLDY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance.
GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTW and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer