PLTW vs. ARMW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

PLTW vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -37.29% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 133.71% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: -20.95%
• YTD: -37.29%
• 1Y: -28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.93%

ARMW

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -28.93%
• 6M: 143.26%
• YTD: 133.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	$3.40M	$4.54M	$4.17M
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.58M	$2.73M	$3.69M

PLTW vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.29%	-0.49%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	133.71%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and ARMW is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.19

PLTW vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTW	ARMW
Technology	20.0%	18.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTW vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	—	—

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-56.50%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.71%	-52.96%	+4.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.26%	-27.31%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.65%	95.78%	-33.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.45%	95.78%	-22.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.45%	95.78%	-22.33%

PLTW vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTW and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

PLTW vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.47%, more than ARMW's 66.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	66.19%	16.38%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	137.47%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and ARMW in my portfolio?

PLTW and ARMW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or ARMW?

PLTW and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or ARMW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 66.19% for ARMW.