PLTU vs. QYLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG).

PLTU and QYLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Dec 10, 2024. QYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020.

Performance

PLTU vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTU vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	-39.02%	223.17%	6.41%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-2.27%	15.29%	-1.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -39.02% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's -2.27% return.

PLTU

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: -39.02%
• 6M: -48.12%
• 1Y: 94.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: -2.27%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 20.32%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

PLTU

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares

QYLG

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

Return for Risk

PLTU vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU

PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 51
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 68
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTU	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.08	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.70	+0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.26	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.85	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	9.05	-5.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTU vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTU and QYLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTU	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.08	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.67	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and QYLG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PLTU vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.99%, more than QYLG's 18.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares	38.99%	23.29%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	18.82%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTU	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.14%	-29.98%	-39.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.96%	-11.45%	-54.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.60%	-4.76%	-52.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.88%	-6.60%	-21.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.24%	2.33%	+27.91%

Volatility

PLTU vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 29.13% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) at 5.88%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTU	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.13%	5.88%	+23.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.25%	10.16%	+66.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.97%	18.87%	+96.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.73%	18.07%	+110.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.73%	18.09%	+110.64%