PLTU vs. ARKW
PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTU returned -42.39% vs -0.73% for ARKW. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTU charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
PLTU vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -57.34% return, which is significantly lower than ARKW's -1.18% return.
PLTU
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -57.71%
- YTD
- -57.34%
- 1Y
- -42.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.18%
PLTU vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | -57.34% | 223.17% | 14.77% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -1.18% | 38.93% | -5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTU and ARKW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PLTU and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
PLTU vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLTU
ARKW
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PLTU
ARKW
Basic Materials
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Communication Services
PLTU
-
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
PLTU
-
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Energy
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Financial Services
PLTU
-
ARKW
Healthcare
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Industrials
PLTU
-
ARKW
Real Estate
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Utilities
PLTU
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTU vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
PLTU
ARKW
PLTU vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTU | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.02 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -0.04 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTU vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -79.43%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTU | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.43% | -80.52% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.43% | -36.21% | -43.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.34% | -20.80% | -49.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -23.95% | -10.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.48% | 18.67% | +26.81% |
Volatility
PLTU vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 32.91% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 9.87%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTU | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.91% | 9.87% | +23.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.51% | 25.38% | +54.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.12% | 33.26% | +69.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 125.99% | 43.72% | +82.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 125.99% | 37.78% | +88.21% |
PLTU vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTU has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTU vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.89%, more than ARKW's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.61% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF | 55.89% | 23.29% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTU and ARKW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTU has higher volatility (32.91%) compared to ARKW (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -79.43% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 1-year performance, ARKW leads with -0.73% vs -42.39% for PLTU. On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 9.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARKW has performed better with a -0.73% return vs -42.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for PLTU.
PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 55.89%, compared with 1.61% for ARKW.
PLTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for PLTU and 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTU and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer