PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTU vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTU vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -47.14% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 23.86% return.


PLTU

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.95%
YTD
-47.14%
6M
-47.66%
1Y
-18.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
4.14%
1M
21.48%
YTD
23.86%
6M
26.22%
1Y
88.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
-47.14%223.17%-2.86%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
23.86%32.45%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and NVDG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTU vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU
PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTUNVDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

2.09

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

4.75

-5.21

PLTU vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTU and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTUNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

1.32

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDG drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTUNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-66.19%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.10%

-42.72%

-25.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.25%

-14.96%

-48.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-23.05%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.64%

18.79%

+20.85%

Volatility

PLTU vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 33.28% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) at 25.17%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTUNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.28%

25.17%

+8.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.26%

50.28%

+26.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.08%

67.73%

+35.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.08%

90.65%

+36.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.08%

90.65%

+36.43%

PLTU vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTU vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.98%, more than NVDG's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
9.54%11.81%0.00%
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
44.98%23.29%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTU and NVDG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTU has higher volatility (33.28%) compared to NVDG (25.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -69.14% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 88.87% vs -18.22% for PLTU. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 25.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 88.87% return vs -18.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for PLTU.

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 44.98%, compared with 9.54% for NVDG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for PLTU and 0.75% for NVDG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTU and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer