PLTR vs. RSPD
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 43.04%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for RSPD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTR vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -24.14% return, which is significantly lower than RSPD's -2.95% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- 6M
- -21.12%
- YTD
- -24.14%
- 1Y
- -12.16%
- 3Y*
- 101.71%
- 5Y*
- 43.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 56.59%
RSPD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.11%
PLTR vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -24.14% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.95% | 7.98% | 13.37% | 22.55% | -24.03% | 28.75% | 20.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and RSPD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PLTR and RSPD has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
RSPD
PLTR vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.07 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 0.16 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than RSPD's maximum drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -68.00% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.22% | -13.80% | -34.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.22% | -21.01% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -34.41% | -44.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.91% | -7.79% | -27.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -10.67% | -29.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.39% | 6.02% | +18.37% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) at 5.11%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 5.11% | +10.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.68% | 14.34% | +25.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.53% | 18.56% | +32.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.63% | 22.13% | +43.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.51% | 23.09% | +46.42% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and RSPD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to RSPD (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs RSPD's -68.00%.
RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer