PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLTR vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 0.82% return.


PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*

NEM

1D
2.71%
1M
-15.55%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.58%
1Y
81.14%
3Y*
36.14%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
0.82%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%-3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and NEM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.11

Fundamentals

EPS

PLTR:

$0.89

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

PLTR:

144.03

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

PLTR:

0.84

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

PLTR:

62.90

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLTR:

$5.22B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLTR:

$4.39B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLTR:

$2.01B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTRNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.29

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.78

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

7.58

-7.84

PLTR vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, roughly equal to the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-81.30%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.22%

-29.39%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-36.57%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-62.40%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.22%

-23.71%

-14.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-41.37%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.23%

10.73%

+10.50%

Volatility

PLTR vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 15.74%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.16%

15.74%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.32%

37.43%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.83%

47.44%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

37.99%

+27.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.75%

35.67%

+34.08%

Dividends

PLTR vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLTR vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
1.63B
0
(PLTR) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and NEM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to NEM (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer