PLTR vs. MAGS
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, PLTR returned 99.99%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PLTR vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -1.59% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 104.65% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and MAGS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PLTR and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
MAGS
PLTR vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.20 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.25 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 4.21 | -4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -29.91% | -54.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.22% | -18.62% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -29.91% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.22% | -8.50% | -29.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -4.72% | -35.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 5.50% | +15.73% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 5.86% | +11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.32% | 15.07% | +23.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 20.30% | +30.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 25.97% | +39.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.75% | 25.97% | +43.78% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and MAGS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer