PLTR vs. IBTJ
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 39.00%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for IBTJ. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than IBTJ's 0.04% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and IBTJ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. IBTJ — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
IBTJ
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.02 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 5.49 | -5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than IBTJ's maximum drawdown of -20.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and IBTJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -20.19% | -64.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.22% | -1.62% | -36.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -4.43% | -36.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -17.21% | -61.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.22% | -6.17% | -32.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -9.71% | -30.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 0.59% | +20.64% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) at 0.69%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 0.69% | +16.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.32% | 1.58% | +36.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 2.36% | +48.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 5.73% | +59.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.75% | 5.98% | +63.77% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. IBTJ - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and IBTJ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs IBTJ's -20.19%.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and IBTJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer