PLTR vs. CMFP.L
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 40.28%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for CMFP.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PLTR is traded in USD, while CMFP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMFP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 13.99% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- 5.25%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -26.49%
- 1Y
- -1.96%
- 3Y*
- 102.18%
- 5Y*
- 40.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -24.21% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 13.99% | 16.67% | 5.08% | -6.76% | 18.60% | 33.39% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and CMFP.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
CMFP.L
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.27 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.70 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 7.67 | -7.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than CMFP.L's maximum drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -72.10% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.22% | -8.27% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -23.04% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -23.04% | -56.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.98% | -21.78% | -13.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -49.88% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.35% | 2.92% | +18.43% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.72% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.72% | 4.25% | +13.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.70% | 12.41% | +26.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.17% | 14.44% | +36.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.49% | 20.39% | +45.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.76% | 16.60% | +53.16% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTR nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and CMFP.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer