PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. AEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLTR is traded in USD, while AEM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AEM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than AEM.TO's -3.93% return.


PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-5.33%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*

AEM.TO

1D
3.10%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
51.11%
5Y*
20.53%
10Y*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.93%119.66%46.16%9.25%1.57%-23.52%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and AEM.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLTR:

$329.05B

AEM.TO:

CA$114.10B

EPS

PLTR:

$0.89

AEM.TO:

$10.65

PE Ratio

PLTR:

144.03

AEM.TO:

15.27

PEG Ratio

PLTR:

0.84

AEM.TO:

0.23

PS Ratio

PLTR:

62.90

AEM.TO:

6.03

PB Ratio

PLTR:

38.94

AEM.TO:

3.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLTR:

$5.22B

AEM.TO:

$13.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLTR:

$4.39B

AEM.TO:

$8.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLTR:

$2.01B

AEM.TO:

$9.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTRAEM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.17

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

0.89

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

2.53

-2.78

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and AEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and AEM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRAEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-74.20%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.22%

-39.50%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-39.50%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-45.01%

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.22%

-35.39%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-34.34%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.23%

13.89%

+7.34%

Volatility

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) at 15.81%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRAEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.16%

15.81%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.32%

35.50%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.83%

43.82%

+7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

35.76%

+29.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.75%

36.46%

+33.29%

Dividends

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.03%0.97%1.95%2.98%2.81%2.08%1.34%0.81%0.80%0.77%0.75%0.95%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.63B
4.10B
(PLTR) Total Revenue
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLTR vs. AEM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palantir Technologies Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
86.8%
66.4%
Portfolio components
PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

AEM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

AEM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.

AEM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and AEM.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and AEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer