PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. POSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than POSIX's 6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTQX has outperformed POSIX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while POSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.10% annualized return.


PLTQX

1D
0.39%
1M
4.46%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.81%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.54%

POSIX

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
6.90%
6M
6.37%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
9.40%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
6.90%7.57%0.67%10.87%-26.74%23.45%-3.91%24.53%-3.35%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and POSIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.72

The correlation between PLTQX and POSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. POSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

POSIX
POSIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
POSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
POSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
POSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
POSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTQXPOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.14

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

0.89

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.92

3.25

+11.67

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the POSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and POSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTQXPOSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.75

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.02

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.24

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.17

+0.53

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, smaller than the maximum POSIX drawdown of -68.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and POSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXPOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-68.45%

+39.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-9.97%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-18.02%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-34.15%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-41.70%

+12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.95%

+5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-13.93%

+9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.71%

-1.12%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) is 2.91%, while Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that PLTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXPOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.65%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

9.00%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

11.82%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

16.30%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

16.99%

-3.19%

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than POSIX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. POSIX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than POSIX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.11%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.47%2.64%2.57%2.63%1.12%2.40%1.13%6.32%3.81%4.16%3.70%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTQX and POSIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POSIX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PLTQX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs POSIX's -68.45%.

PLTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and POSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer